Monday, September 8, 2014
The Cinematography of Roger Deakins
The Cinematography of Roger Deakins
I've uploaded a link to the a breakdown of some of the camerawork of cinematographer Roger Deakins in the film 'Prisoners'. Deakins is one of Hollywood's best loved cinematographers and is responsible for many influential films, including O Brother Where Art Thou, A Beautiful Mind, No Country for Old Men and Shawshank Redemption.
Sunday, September 7, 2014
BCA WORKSHOP PRACTICE: Short Form Video
By the end of this week you should have the following completed:
8 x video critiques
1 x editing exercise (recut an existing video - don't forget to upload the original)
2 x videos exploring the theme of memory
1 x interview with synced sound
1 x re-edit of interview with keyframed audio
1 x lighting exercise
1 x scene with controlled colour.
8 x video critiques
1 x editing exercise (recut an existing video - don't forget to upload the original)
2 x videos exploring the theme of memory
1 x interview with synced sound
1 x re-edit of interview with keyframed audio
1 x lighting exercise
1 x scene with controlled colour.
Monday, September 1, 2014
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Here's a link to an interesting interview with a full-time filmmaker, working mostly on music videos, some of which are featured in the linked interview.
A day in the life of a full time filmmaker
A day in the life of a full time filmmaker
Thursday, August 21, 2014
Où est ma moustache Mademoiselle? (Part Two)
In this post I want to examine some of the edits in closer detail. The audio plays a big role in making the transitions work well, bringing them to life.
I put the video into Premiere and sliced it up with the razor tool. I noticed that the magic in the sequence above is 15 frames long. Each of these 15 frames is cut out of a longer sequence, so the effect is one where the footage speeds up. The sound effects make the fast editing stand out. Here's how they did it:
This shot is held for just over 3 seconds or 92 frames.
This shot lasts for one frame.
All of these shots are a single frame too.
Here's my attempt at recreating the shot sequence:
original from Men Glaw on Vimeo.
What I discovered re-creating the video is that the editor has cut out individual frames from the original video and put these frames into a timeline in a sequence. As I mentioned above, the thing that really makes the effect powerful is the crackling, fizzing, popping sound effect underneath.
Here's my timeline so you can see what I've done. The original video is on the bottom video line V1. My video is on the video line above V2.
Où est ma moustache Mademoiselle? (Part One)
This is my video analysis for weeks four and five. Instead of analysing two videos, I've decided to break this analysis into two parts: one which concentrates on the symbolic structure of the video.
week's video for analysis looks at production design and video transitions driven by sound effects.
Source: Again, I found this video on Vimeo.
Structure: The narrative structure of this video is, ironically, one of anti-structure. The sequence of events is not important and the actions themselves are fundamentally absurd. If it is absurd for a woman to have a moustache, then the narrative must be equally absurd.
Symbolism: However, if we examine the video more closely, we notice that its meaning is best read at a deeper symbolic level. Although there are several philosophical readings that might be applied to the video. I will focus on gender politics.
The Secretary
The woman is dressed in two costumes, one masculine the other feminine. Dressed in women's clothing, she plays the role of the secretary, working on a typewriter - typically a role associated with women.
Note: The whiskey decanter contains flowers, symbolically also associated with the feminine.
The Boss
The masculine costume, the tuxedo, is symbolic not only of a man, but a powerful man, one with wealth and prestige. We see him pouring whiskey from a crystal decanter, smoking a cigar and taking calls on the telephone with his feet up on desk.
The video comments on the absurdity of gendered role differentiations in the workplace. The masculine and feminine characters - differentiated by their costumes - wear the same moustache, sit in the same office, work under the same lamp, with the same telephone, and the same the same trophy deer head mounted on the wall behind them. The natural question then we are led to ask is: if all these things are the same, then why should the roles/actions (drinking whiskey, typing, etc) be differentiated by gender?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












